Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 20th, 2006 at and is filed under Insurance. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

24 comments so far

 1 

IT can take a lot of effort to destroy America as the UAW shows.

The UAW is a Democrat Ponzi Scheme designed to sink the US

April 23rd, 2006 at
 2 

If the manufacturers without the unions are holding up just fine in the current economy, then you have to wonder….

April 24th, 2006 at
 3 

Recently, a neighbor and friend, was making the point that the reason that the car industry and the country’s economy were collapsing was because of unions. You know, those outdated collective institutions of the past two centuries that are blamed for having brought the most powerful economy in the world, first to stagnation, and now to regression. Never mind, that unions were responsible for making the U.S. economy as great as it once was and the time before that, and before that. Never mind that unions and workers built the biggest middle class in world history. Never mind that unions gave a single bread-winner in a family the ability to support it, buy a home, and send the kids to college. Never mind that unions are the collective voice that can stand up for the workers and fight exploitation. And never mind, that when workers hit the golden years, that unions brought them the ability to retire on a comfortable pension.

People have been heard saying that unions have been scamming the people for so long now that everything is falling apart. Yesireee. Did you happen to notice that when Wall Street collapsed that the United States government handed the bankers and securities people all those billions of dollars without any accountability? It wasn’t the unions that received all that money. You didn’t know that none of the millions of taxpayer/worker dollars headed into the pockets of the union membership and workers? No? You did notice, didn’t you, that all those CEOs and upper management people who received bailouts, golden parachutes, bonuses and incentives, that they were not union members? They were not.

I guess what bothers and rankles my feathers is how any working person in the USA can blame other workers for the wages that they receive or for the problems in the economy. Doing so, in my opinion, shows a disregard or ignorance for U.S. labor history. It highlights the success that the owning class has had in pitting worker against worker while absconding with the material wealth that all workers have collectively created. CEO’s don’t create any new wealth. Workers do. And destructive Capitalist CEOs, and the owning class, do nothing but manipulate the labor and commodity-money-commodity exchanges so that all wealth can trickle up from the worker on the bottom to the CEOs at the top. The owning class has been doing this for centuries. They have been riding the worker-created gravy train during the times of Capitalism’s boom cycle while blaming the worker for Capitalism’s bust cycle. The owning class always wins. The working class, however, has been trained by them, to blame itself when the bust arrives. Welcome to the bust.

April 25th, 2006 at
 4 

A collective agreement is about wages and working conditions. Enclosed there is always an article written and insisted upon by the Employer that vests the right to manage with the Employer. Blaming the employees for bad management is frankly stupid, since they are excluded by the very document you cite from any responsibility.

April 27th, 2006 at
 5 

Every clause in that contract was negotiated and agreed to by representatives of both labor and management.

April 27th, 2006 at
 6 

I can’t blame labor unions for trying to look out for their workers as I cannot blame businesses for trying to pull profits. We can’t simply blame the executives and we can’t simply blame labor unions. They BOTH need to take cuts, UAW and the Execs. Unions and executives are essential for the economy. In fact, unions are responsible for driving up wages making the compensation market more competitive.

April 30th, 2006 at
 7 

Get with the 21at century- it’s 10 kilograms.

May 3rd, 2006 at
 8 

There is a basic fact in the science of biology. It seems to apply to unions as well. Any organism, who’s growth is left unchecked, will eventually die in it’s own poisons.

Isn’t it like democrats to blame someone else? I’m sure Ford would be happy with 20 pages. The Unions demanded each and every sentence of the rest. Then they blame management for agreeing to it. Go figure?

May 5th, 2006 at
 9 

Lowtechs!!! Third world are better bcoz they put it in a 700MB CD PDF format. Rather than a 2000pages of coupon, besides UAW are the same as coupons

May 5th, 2006 at
 10 

I have absolutely no respect for the UAW and their president. I watched his “interview/speech” last week and caught him in quite a few lies and embellishments. He can’t be trusted. Sen. Vitter from Tennessee has a really good plan for the auto industry, and the UAW president lied, lied, lied about Sen. Vitter. How dare he! Just to make his point come across, he had to lie? GIve me a break. The auto industry needs to file Chapter 11 and get on with it. Are they too embarrassed to do that? That’s what I think. And the UAW would be knocked down a few pegs in Bankruptcy. And Lordy, Lordy, Lordy, they certainly don’t want their image “tarnished!

HERE’S A KICKER: YESTERDAY ON CABLE NEWS, IT CAME OUT THAT FORD HAS CASH ON HAND TO TAKE THEM THROUGH ALL OF 2009. GOOD FOR THEM. AND I QUESTION WHY DAIMLER DOESN’T BAIL OUT CHRYSLER. THEY ARE THE PARENT COMPANY AND HAVE SCADS OF DOUGH. GM IS THE WORSE ONES. ENOUGH TO HOLD THEM THROUGH THE END OF 2008? EGADS, TALK ABOUT BAD MANAGEMENT.

May 5th, 2006 at
 11 

That is exactly why when in the past I’ve been approached by union reps I’ve told them to go suck an egg.

Unions hurt business’s over the long run, when business’s hurt, WE lose jobs.

The “Big Three” are drowning in rules and regs from the UAW and the Federal Government.
It’s wonder they’ve lasted this long.

May 6th, 2006 at
 12 

The unions have priced themselves out of a job.The automakers are so busy trying to negotiate labor contracts that they can’t build an American car to the same quality as Honda or Toyota.And the American Public is tired of cars that breakdown at every opportunity.Honda and Toyota have plants in the US with American labor – Japanesse Quality control and they run 3 time longer than American Cars with 1/2 their parts from South America or korea.They have to use cheaper materials to offset the huge pay and benefits from 30 years of UAW contracts.Many workers at the Honda plants are not unionized and management can get rid of those employees that don’t do their fair share of the work.The big three have a lot of employees that are non productive.The japanese are like swarming ants working as a group to achieve success.

May 7th, 2006 at
 13 

Unions outlived their usefulness in the 1960′s. By that time, government had all the rules and regulations necessary to prevent the abuses that unions were supposedly initiated to prevent. Since that time, unions (mostly controlled by the mafia, especially Teamsters) used strong-arm tactics and threats of strikes to negotiate contracts that were outrageous and unfair to non-union workers. They tipped the scales in favor of overpayment of workers, skimming profits and union dues for illegal activities, and political power garnered through intimidation.

The auto industry was the most affected because after the unions put the screws to them, they opted to move the majority of their operations outside of the country. There is not one vehicle made in America that is completely US made. Parts, electronics, motors, all of this is made in other countries. Yet the unions continued to pressure the industry, and the greedy CEO’s continued to give themselves the lion’s share of any profits while agreeing to outlandish union demands, continually running their companies into the ground.

The big 3 had ‘gone under’ long before the current economic crisis. Union power was waning, and instead of taking advantage of more freedom to update and rennovate their companies, CEO’s grabbed all of the money they could get their hands on, knowing full well that their companies would collapse under the weight of mis-management and existing union contracts. Plenty of blame to go around, but the initial demise falls clearly at the feet of the unions.

May 7th, 2006 at
 14 

I hear ya..the UAW and the NEA are both corrupt and need te be busted up. We constantly hear from politicians about the evil special interests but never about the two big ones. Not to worry though, Obama promised to clean it up. Have some faith will ya.

May 8th, 2006 at
 15 

In part yeah but governmental regulations and political corectness as well – they need to stop being babies and do what they do make cars and not worry about “political corectness” and cowering to the unions
although easier said than done but If you They are desperate enough and pathetic enough to go to the government and willing to have a carzar then they should be willing to do the fore mentioned and even more so since then they will retain control and not give over some of their power to part of the problem. It is all crazy – but then maybe we are all just living-room quarterbacks

May 10th, 2006 at
 16 

The unions are the major factor, but their are a lot of causation’s. I know that Toyota of America thinks if GM goes under, they plan on taking it over. I think if Toyota gets GM, they will turn them around.

May 13th, 2006 at
 17 

I think it will make good fire starter or fuel for those with fireplaces, that’s the only positive energy it could possibly contain

May 14th, 2006 at
 18 

Can you say part of a massive Ponzi Scheme?

May 14th, 2006 at
 19 

I think they have one hell of a nerve to bite the hand that feeds them!

May 16th, 2006 at
 20 

Unions are a lot like liberalism.

Back in the day, unions helped the working man get a fair deal and make the workplace safer. Back in the day, liberals did things like make our water safe, eliminate child labor, bringing electricity to rural areas, provide good public schools and help provide a safety net for those really in need.

Decades ago though, they went beyond helping and actually starting harming. How often have we heard of union contracts that require an extra qualified electrician on the job to flip a switch twice a day, or requiring extra workers because the work was out of someone’s job classification (even though they could do it just fine), etc. These UAW contracts are even worse, requiring auto makers to continue to pay people in “jobs banks” even though they aren’t working, etc.

Same with liberalism. All the good causes are done. Now it’s pushing gay marriage down or throats, multiple bloated entitlements, weakening our national security and blocking needed reforms in public education.

May 16th, 2006 at
 21 

Yea, I asked the same question, this is exactly why the Big 3 are going under. See mine, the link to the documents has been removed for some reason. I went off on some of the responders. lol

May 16th, 2006 at
 22 

During those years when I was growing into an adult, American cars were just about all we had to choose from, and the average guy traded his car in every two or three years. These American made cars only lasted for about 100K miles, but nobody cared much about that, because people were always employed building more cars; and they wanted to drive the new models. It was kinda fun.
But when we started helping the Japanese rebuild their war-torn economy, we allowed their cars to be sold on the American market with generous trade agreements.
The Japanese, however, were industrious people who demanded high quality from their industries. They began building cars designed to last for twenty years, and go for 300k miles.
This was great for the consumer, but would eventually prove to be bad for our economy. Who needs a car to last for twenty years, if you lose your job in the process of building it ?
Is this the new American dream:—to be an unemployed guy with a nice car in his landlord’s driveway?
Since Henry Ford mass produced cars and made them affordable to the average Joe, Americans have been smarter in business.— until we started taking lessons from foreign manufacturers.
We had lower quality, but more job security, and less cut-throat competition than the other guys.
We won’t be able to return to the good old days, because the consumers will always go for the higher quality. But rapidly changing new technologies make it less sensible to build cars that last for twenty years, when they will become obsolete in five.—Americans constantly change their minds about what they want. One day it’s fast cars with lots of horse power; another day it’s big luxury cars, then it’s small economy cars, then SUVs, and now it’s green cars, and who knows what’s next.
We need to re-educate American consumers, and keep them employed.
If you need to blame somebody for this mess: blame all of us for trying to get too much bang for our shrinking buck.

May 16th, 2006 at
 23 

Botrh management and the UAW have guilt in this matter and both should be forced to take drastic cuts in pay and benefits. The retirees should not be given medical for life. The problem is not in the wages paid, they are about 15% higher then the non-union “Foriegn: auto workers but in the benefits. The UAW can bargain with benefits and threaten a strike because they have the state of Michigan behind them; Michigan has the most union friendly rules in the US-I did not say worker I said union-so the UAW striking basically shuts the plants down. They asked for benefits instead of higher wages because they knew the Big Three could not afford wages but cost of benefits if in the future. The Big Three should file bankruptcy and then reorganize and get out of the mountain of costs involved with those benefits. They should also move the plants out of Michigan and let the unions support the state instead of the unions getting the businesses to do so. For the answer on Daimler bailing out Chrysler-rysler was sold and Damler has no ownership. For CEO’s not creating wealth-How do workers create wealth without a company? From what I see the UAW is interested in nothing but the betterment of the UAW and not concerned at all about creating wealth for the country-They would require 40 hour pay for a one hour work week if they could get away with it ad with their “Job Banks” it is not that far off; that allows you to collect 38 hours pay for getting laid off and then soing nothing. High wages do allow workers to buy more but it also requires higher prices which means you can afford to buy less so it is a balance that is needed and paying higher wages might hurt the economy as much or more then help it.

May 19th, 2006 at
 24 

That’s part of the problem. But if you put the UAW contract beside the U.S. Tax Code, the union contract looks puny.

May 20th, 2006 at

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.